RealTest Low Drawdown Nasdaq Mean Reversion Strategy
A RealTest mean-reversion strategy for Nasdaq 100 stocks that sizes each position by current market volatility. It buys oversold pullbacks in the Connors and Alvarez style, then automatically holds less when markets turn turbulent, which is what keeps its drawdowns shallow. Tested on survivorship-free Norgate data with commissions modeled, and trading live since January 2025.
Validated four ways
What happened in every crash
| Crisis | Dates | Strategy | SPY | Same $100k in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dotcom crash | Mar 2000 – Oct 2002 | 48.7% | -41.8% | |
| 2008 financial crisis | Oct 2007 – Mar 2009 | 0.6% | -49.9% | |
| COVID-19 crash | Feb 2020 – Mar 2020 | 0.0% | -28.7% | |
| 2022 bear market | Jan 2022 – Oct 2022 | 2.5% | -21.3% |
Strategy monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 1.6 | 7.0 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 6.7 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 | -1.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 46.2% |
| 2001 | 1.3 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 13.4% |
| 2002 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.6 | -1.0 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 3.8% |
| 2003 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.7 | -2.1 | 7.7 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 31.1% |
| 2004 | 0.4 | 3.3 | -0.4 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 13.7% |
| 2005 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.4 | -3.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | -0.1 | 4.2 | 13.7% |
| 2006 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 20.7% |
| 2007 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | -0.6 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 13.6% |
| 2008 | -5.1 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | -3.3 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.2% |
| 2009 | 0.1 | -1.0 | -0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | -1.0 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 3.6 | -1.2 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 9.8% |
| 2010 | -2.4 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.3 | -0.0 | -1.8 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 6.7% |
| 2011 | 0.6 | 1.0 | -0.6 | 0.4 | 2.3 | -2.4 | -0.2 | -3.6 | -0.0 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 3.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | -0.4 | -0.3 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 4.9% |
| 2013 | 1.1 | 2.7 | -0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 16.3% |
| 2014 | -2.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 2.4% |
| 2015 | 2.6 | -0.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.5 | -0.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 11.6% |
| 2016 | -2.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | -0.2 | 0.4 | -0.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.6% |
| 2017 | 2.2 | -0.1 | -0.5 | -0.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 7.5% |
| 2018 | 1.2 | -2.3 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 1.1 | -0.6 | -0.6 | 0.2 | 1.2 | -2.9 | 0.6 | -1.9 | -1.5% |
| 2019 | -0.0 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 0.5 | -2.7 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 10.5% |
| 2020 | -0.5 | -0.1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 3.8 | -1.1 | 6.2 | 3.9 | 20.7% |
| 2021 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | -2.0 | 0.5 | -1.5 | 2.0 | 12.3% |
| 2022 | 0.3 | 2.4 | -0.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | -0.3 | 0.2 | -0.1 | -1.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 6.2% |
| 2023 | 0.2 | -0.4 | 2.5 | -1.2 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 0.9 | -0.1 | -1.6 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 7.3% |
| 2024 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | -0.6 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | -4.0 | 6.0% |
| 2025 | 6.6 | 0.1 | -0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | -0.1 | 0.6 | 1.8 | -3.6 | 0.4 | 6.7% |
| 2026 | 2.3 | 0.8 | -1.2 | 0.2 | -0.8 | 1.1 | 12.9 | 2.6 | 18.6% |
Strategy overview
Strategy details & model assumptions
Details
Costs included in results
What you get


What you need
Quick start & live trading
What traders say
Buying a SetupAlpha strategy didn't save me money, it saved me research time. I estimate it replaced 70–90 hours of development, debugging, and validation. Even if I never trade the strategy exactly as delivered, the research process was worth the investment.
I've been using a strategy from SetupAlpha and I'm really impressed with its elegance and stability. The unique approach gives me a fresh perspective and ideas I can apply to other strategies I'm developing. I'm currently working on integrating it into my suite of trading strategies.
I traded discretionary for over a decade and kept putting off going systematic because I did not know where to start. Having a finished, tested system to take apart was what finally got me moving.
I have run it live since 2024 and it is still in my portfolio. It also changed how I test the systems I build myself.
FAQ
What is RealTest Low Drawdown Nasdaq Mean Reversion Strategy?
Why should this edge keep working?
What is RealTest and what software do I need?
How was this backtested?
Are transaction costs included?
When did live trading start?
What's included in the download?
How does it compare to SPY?
Can I modify the code?
What market data do I need?
Can I automate execution?
Can I ask questions about the code or the strategy?
| Metric | Strategy | SPY |
| Sharpe | 1.42 | 0.48 |
| ROR | 11.13% | – |
| Sortino | 1.32 | 0.45 |
| MAR | 1.3 | – |
| Net profit | $1.6M | $492k |
| Expectancy | 1.01% | – |
| Max exposure | 99.73% | 100% |
| Worst year | -1.5% | -33.2% |
Download the complete strategy now





